[xstreamos-discuss] xs153 pkg update issue

[Jason Robinson]

Thanks Gabriele,

I know and understand, which is why I greatly appreciate everyone
taking their time to assist and I hope I haven't come across as
impatient. I look forward to the iso.

Jason

On 25/03/2017, Gabriele Bulfon <gabriele.bulfon at sonicle.com> wrote:
> Hi Jason, I've been very busy these last two days.
> I will build a new iso in the weekend and send you a link to check it.
> Thanks to you!
> Gabriele
> -= Sent using Webtop 5 =-
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Da: Jason Robinson
> A: Paolo Marcheschi
> Cc: Gabriele Bulfon
> xstreamos-discuss at lists.sonicle.com Al Slater
> Data: 25 marzo 2017 0.21.57 CET
> Oggetto: Re: [xstreamos-discuss] xs153 pkg update issue
> Hi Paolo / Gabriele,
> I really appreciate the assistance given thus far. I am not inclined
> or in favour of using up your time any further on this, if using the
> latest iso is the best solution. The only reason I would pursue
> troubleshooting, is for the fact that it may help others until the
> next iso release, or at the very least, if they need to re-install on
> other hardware.
> Please let me know your thoughts on this.
> Jason
> P.S.: Based on not just the OS, but also on your phenomenal help, I
> have been advocating this distribution to everyone I can at the
> office. I told them that once I have it setup and can run the
> applications I/we care about, I will give them a demo. They have
> already been sold on OmniOS (we just set that up on a production
> server, with git running in a zone), however for personal use, they
> are considering OI. I am hoping to show them this as a viable option,
> I know I will be using XStreamOS Desktop as my daily driver once this
> issue is resolved.
> On 22/03/2017, Jason Robinson
> wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> Thanks for stepping in to assist.
> I tried your suggestion, however there seems to be a lot of circular
> dependencies with the packages, i.e. one can't be uninstalled without
> the other, and the main ones are tied to
> pkg://sonicle.com/consolidation/xstream/os
> See the attached file "pkg-uninstall" for more details.
> Regards,
> Jason
> On 22/03/2017, Paolo Marcheschi
> wrote:
> Hi
> Have you tried to remove these packages :
> pkg uninstall pkg://sonicle.com/service/network/dhcp
> pkg://sonicle.com/network/dhcp/dhcpmgr
> pkg://sonicle.com/install/installadm
> pkg://sonicle.com/service/network/smtp/sendmail
> pkg://sonicle.com/system/network/mailwrapper
> pkg://sonicle.com/network/ftp
> pkg://sonicle.com/system/library/math/header-math
> I have this list saved in my notes.
> I hope this helps.
> Paolo
> On 03/21/17 09:08 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Let's see if Al or Paolo remember the passages they did :)
> If not, I will provide you with a new iso shortly.
> Gabriele
> /-= Sent using Webtop 5 =-/
> *Gabriele Bulfon - Sonicle S.r.l.*
> Tel +39 028246016 Int. 30 - Fax +39 028243880
> via Fra Cristoforo, 14/D - 20142 - Milano - Italy
> http://www.sonicle.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Da: Jason Robinson
> A: Gabriele Bulfon
> Cc: xstreamos-discuss at lists.sonicle.com
> Data: 21 marzo 2017 20.39.58 CET
> Oggetto: Re: [xstreamos-discuss] xs153 pkg update issue
> Hi Gabriele,
> No such luck.
> Excerpt from pkg-update-all file:
> # pkg update
> pkg update: The following packages all deliver file actions to
> usr/sbin/ping:
> pkg://sonicle.com/SUNWcs@0.5.11,5.11-1.154.0.0.0:20151007T162511Z
> pkg://sonicle.com/network/ftp@0.5.11,5.11-1.153.0.0.0:20141007T094850Z
> These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting
> set
> may
> be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed.
> The following packages deliver conflicting action types to
> usr/lib/sendmail:
> link:
> pkg://sonicle.com/system/network/mailwrapper@0.5.11,5.11-1.154.0.0.0:20151007T162630Z
> file:
> pkg://sonicle.com/service/network/smtp/sendmail@8.14.4,5.11-1.153.0.0.0:20141007T094901Z
> These packages may not be installed together. Any non-conflicting
> set
> may
> be, or the packages must be corrected before they can be installed.
> ...
> ...
> ...
>